In THE MATTER OF JOHN L.G. HERBERT, JR. (Four Cases)

319 Ga. 881
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 1, 2024
DocketS24Y0682, S24Y1175, S24Y1176, S24Y1177
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 319 Ga. 881 (In THE MATTER OF JOHN L.G. HERBERT, JR. (Four Cases)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In THE MATTER OF JOHN L.G. HERBERT, JR. (Four Cases), 319 Ga. 881 (Ga. 2024).

Opinion

319 Ga. 881 FINAL COPY

S24Y0682, S24Y1175, S24Y1176, S24Y1177. IN THE MATTER OF JOHN L. G. HERBERT, JR.

PER CURIAM.

These disciplinary matters are before the Court on Notices of

Discipline seeking the disbarment of John L. G. Herbert, Jr. (State

Bar No. 348226), on the basis of numerous alleged violations of the

Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct (hereinafter, “GRPC”) related

to 11 client grievances. Because Herbert, who has been a member of

the Bar since 1994, failed to file a Notice of Rejection, he is in default,

has waived his right to an evidentiary hearing, and is subject to such

discipline and further proceedings as may be determined by this

Court. See Bar Rule 4-208.1 (b).

The facts, as deemed admitted by virtue of Herbert’s default,

are as follows. The 11 grievants, or their associated LLCs, are

overseas investors in real property located in the United States. The

grievants desired to have the proceeds of their investments and other deposits held in the United States banking system and

Herbert offered to receive, hold, and disburse these funds. Herbert

stopped responding to requests for information and accountings

from the grievants beginning around November 2022, at which point

each of the grievants had outstanding balances with Herbert. The

grievants collectively reported losses of approximately $850,000 in

funds that had been entrusted to Herbert and were converted to his

use.

As to each of the grievances, the Bar determined that Herbert

violated the following provisions of the GRPC: Rule 1.2 (a),1 Rule

1 This Rule provides, in pertinent part, that “a lawyer shall abide by a

client’s decisions concerning the scope and objectives of representation and, as required by Rule 1.4, shall consult with the client as to the means by which they are to be pursued.”

2 1.4,2 Rule 1.5 (a),3 Rule 1.15 (I) (a),4 Rule 1.15 (I) (c),5 Rule 1.15 (I)

(d),6 Rule 1.15 (II) (a),7 Rule 1.15 (II) (b),8 Rule 1.15 (II) (c),9 Rule

2 This Rule provides, in pertinent part, that “a lawyer shall . . . keep the

client reasonably informed about the status of the matter . . . [and] promptly comply with reasonable requests for information.”

3 This Rule provides that “[a] lawyer shall not make an agreement for,

charge, or collect an unreasonable fee or an unreasonable amount for expenses,” followed by a list of factors to be considered in determining reasonableness.

4 This Rule provides:

A lawyer shall hold funds or other property of clients or third persons that are in a lawyer’s possession in connection with a representation separate from the lawyer’s own funds or other property. Funds shall be kept in one or more separate accounts maintained in an approved institution as defined by Rule 1.15 (III) (c) (1). Other property shall be identified as such and appropriately safeguarded. Complete records of such account funds and other property shall be kept by the lawyer and shall be preserved for a period of six years after termination of the representation.

5 This Rule provides:

Upon receiving funds or other property in which a client or third person has an interest, a lawyer shall promptly notify the client or third person. Except as stated in this rule or otherwise permitted by law or by agreement with the client, a lawyer shall promptly deliver to the client or third person any funds or other property that the client or third person is entitled to receive and, upon request by the client or third person, shall promptly render a full accounting regarding such property.

6 This Rule provides:

3 When in the course of representation a lawyer is in possession of funds or other property in which both the lawyer and a client or a third person claim interest, the property shall be kept separate by the lawyer until there is an accounting and severance of their interests. If a dispute arises concerning their respective interests, the portion in dispute shall be kept separate by the lawyer until the dispute is resolved. The lawyer shall promptly distribute all portions of the funds or property as to which the interests are not in dispute.

7 This Rule provides, in pertinent part, that “[a]ll funds held by a lawyer

for a client and all funds held by a lawyer in any other fiduciary capacity shall be deposited in and administered from a trust account.”

8 This Rule provides, in pertinent part, that “[n]o funds shall be withdrawn from such trust accounts for the personal use of the lawyer maintaining the account except earned lawyer’s fees debited against the account of a specific client and recorded as such.”

9 This Rule provides, in pertinent part, that “[a]ll client’s funds shall be

placed in either an interest-bearing account at an approved institution with the interest being paid to the client or an interest-bearing (IOLTA) account at an approved institution” and that “[f]unds in such an [ ] account shall be available for withdrawal upon request and without delay, subject only to any notice period which the institution is required to reserve by law or regulation.”

4 1.15 (III) (a),10 Rule 1.15 (III) (b),11 Rule 1.15 (III) (c),12 Rule 1.16

(d),13 Rule 8.4 (a) (4),14 and Rule 9.3.15 The maximum sanction for a

10 This Rule provides:

Every lawyer who practices law in Georgia and who receives money or other property on behalf of a client or in any other fiduciary capacity shall maintain, in an approved financial institution as defined by this rule, a trust account or accounts, separate from any business and personal accounts. Funds received by the lawyer on behalf of a client or in any other fiduciary capacity shall be deposited into this account. The financial institution shall be in Georgia or in the state where the lawyer’s office is located, or elsewhere with the written consent and at the written request of the client or third person.

11 This Rule provides:

(1) A lawyer shall designate all trust accounts, whether general or specific, as well as all deposit slips and checks drawn thereon, as an “Attorney Trust Account,” “Attorney Escrow Account” “IOLTA Account” or “Attorney Fiduciary Account.” The name of the attorney or law firm responsible for the account shall also appear on all deposit slips and checks drawn thereon. (2) A lawyer shall designate all business accounts, as well as all deposit slips and all checks drawn thereon, as a “Business Account,” a “Professional Account,” an “Office Account,” a “General Account,” a “Payroll Account,” “Operating Account” or a “Regular Account.” (3) Nothing in this rule shall prohibit a lawyer from using any additional description or designation for a specific business or trust account including fiduciary accounts maintained by the lawyer as executor, guardian, trustee, receiver, agent or in any other fiduciary capacity.

12 This Rule provides, in pertinent part, that “[a] lawyer shall maintain

his or her trust account only in a financial institution approved by the State Bar of Georgia, which shall annually publish a list of approved institutions.”

5 single violation of Rules 1.2, 1.15 (I), 1.15 (II) (a), 1.15 (II) (b), 1.15

(III), and 8.4 (a) (4) is disbarment. The maximum sanction for a

single violation of Rules 1.4, 1.5, 1.15 (II) (c), 1.16 (d), and 9.3 is a

public reprimand.

As to aggravating and mitigating factors, the Bar concluded

that the following aggravating factors applied: a dishonest and

selfish motive, a pattern of misconduct, the commission of multiple

offenses, a refusal to acknowledge the wrongful nature of his

conduct, vulnerability on the part of the overseas victims because

13 This Rule provides:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of Bryan Matthew Pritchett
Supreme Court of Georgia, 2026
In the Matter of Destin Michelle Gillum
Supreme Court of Georgia, 2025

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
319 Ga. 881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-john-lg-herbert-jr-four-cases-ga-2024.