In the Matter of John Jay STOKES, Jr., Debtor. Anthony P. FERRIS, Trustee, Appellee, v. John Jay STOKES, Jr., Appellant

995 F.2d 76, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 17404, 1993 WL 226320
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 14, 1993
Docket92-8710
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 995 F.2d 76 (In the Matter of John Jay STOKES, Jr., Debtor. Anthony P. FERRIS, Trustee, Appellee, v. John Jay STOKES, Jr., Appellant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Matter of John Jay STOKES, Jr., Debtor. Anthony P. FERRIS, Trustee, Appellee, v. John Jay STOKES, Jr., Appellant, 995 F.2d 76, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 17404, 1993 WL 226320 (5th Cir. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this bankruptcy case involving the dis-chargeability of a claim pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523, the primary question is whether a finding of actual fraud and of the applicabili *77 ty of 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) necessarily precludes a finding that the same conduct also amounts to “willful and malicious conduct” under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6). In a comprehensive opinion, Stokes v. Ferris, 150 B.R. 388 (W.D.Tex.1992), the district court, in an appeal from the bankruptcy court, answered the question in the affirmative, holding that the same conduct can give rise to a cause of action under both section 523(a)(2)(A) and section 523(a)(6). See id. at 392.

We affirm, essentially for the reasons stated, and the analysis made, by the district court. This holding is consistent with existing caselaw for, while we are aware of no case that holds that conduct under one of the provisions cannot also constitute conduct under the other, a number of courts have suggested that the same conduct can violate both provisions. See, e.g., Britton v. Price (In re Britton), 950 F.2d 602, 603-05 (9th Cir.1991); Rubin v. West (In re Rubin), 875 F.2d 755, 758 n. 1 (9th Cir.1989); Giangrasso v. Butler (In re Giangrasso), 145 B.R. 319, 321-24 (Bankr.9th Cir.1992); Seay v. Greene (In re Greene), 150 B.R. 282, 285-87 (Bankr. S.D.Fla.1993); Goins v. Day (In re Day), 137 B.R. 335, 341-42 (Bankr.W.D.Mo.1992).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

S & S Food Corp. v. Sherali (In re Sherali)
490 B.R. 104 (N.D. Texas, 2013)
Wachovia Securities, LLC v. Jahelka (In Re Jahelka)
442 B.R. 663 (N.D. Illinois, 2010)
Guinn v. Anderson (In Re Anderson)
403 B.R. 871 (D. Kansas, 2009)
Albarran v. New Form, Inc. (In Re Albarran)
347 B.R. 369 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Horton v. Horton
Fifth Circuit, 2004
Kendrick v. Pleasants (In Re Pleasants)
231 B.R. 893 (E.D. Virginia, 1999)
Weiss v. Alicea (In Re Alicea)
230 B.R. 492 (S.D. New York, 1999)
Small v. Bottone (In Re Bottone)
209 B.R. 257 (D. Massachusetts, 1997)
David L. Printy v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
110 F.3d 853 (First Circuit, 1997)
Gober v. Terra + Corporation
100 F.3d 1195 (Fifth Circuit, 1996)
McCrary v. Barrack (In Re Barrack)
201 B.R. 985 (S.D. California, 1996)
Nguyen v. Van Quach (In Re Van Quach)
187 B.R. 615 (N.D. Illinois, 1995)
Green v. Pawlinski (In Re Pawlinski)
170 B.R. 380 (N.D. Illinois, 1994)
Forrester v. Staggs (In Re Staggs)
178 B.R. 767 (N.D. Indiana, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
995 F.2d 76, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 17404, 1993 WL 226320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-john-jay-stokes-jr-debtor-anthony-p-ferris-trustee-ca5-1993.