In the Matter of John H. Dorsey

Court of Appeals of South Carolina·Decided November 8, 2017·No. 2017-UP-423·Unpublished

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of John H. Dorsey, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-000816

Appeal From Georgetown County William H. Seals, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-423 Submitted October 1, 2017 – Filed November 8, 2017

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and In re Care & Treatment of McCoy, 360 S.C. 425, 602 S.E.2d 58 (2004). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and HILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Matter of John H. Dorsey, (S.C. Ct. App. 2017).

In the Matter of John H. Dorsey (In the Matter of John H. Dorsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
In Re the Care & Treatment of McCoy
602 S.E.2d 58 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2004)