in the Matter of J.M.S.
This text of in the Matter of J.M.S. (in the Matter of J.M.S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice
Sitting: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice
Catherine Stone, Justice
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Delivered and Filed: March 13, 2002
AFFIRMED
Appellant was found to have engaged in delinquent conduct. Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which she concludes that the appeal has no merit. Counsel provided appellant and his guardian with a copy of the brief and informed them of appellant's right to review the record and file his own brief. See In re A.L.H., 974 S.W.2d 359, 360-61 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1998, no pet.); Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1996, no pet.).
We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Appellate counsel's motion to withdraw is granted. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1.
PHIL HARDBERGER,
CHIEF JUSTICE
DO NOT PUBLISH
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Matter of J.M.S., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-jms-texapp-2002.