In the Matter of Jimmy Ray Filyaw

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

In the Matter of Jimmy Ray Filyaw

DecidedMarch 18, 2020

Docket2018-000425

StatusUnpublished

This text of In the Matter of Jimmy Ray Filyaw (In the Matter of Jimmy Ray Filyaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Matter of Jimmy Ray Filyaw, (S.C. Ct. App. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Jimmy Ray Filyaw, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2018-000425

Appeal From Florence County D. Craig Brown, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-076 Submitted February 1, 2020 – Filed March 18, 2020

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and In re McCoy, 360 S.C. 425, 602 S.E.2d 58 (2004). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, KONDUROS, and HILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI