In the Matter of Jerome S. Stanley, Esq., United States of America v. Oble Peters, Jr.

Ninth Circuit

In the Matter of Jerome S. Stanley, Esq., United States of America v. Oble Peters, Jr.

598 F.2d 1210, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 13966

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJune 15, 1979

Docket77-1793

StatusPublished

This text of 598 F.2d 1210 (In the Matter of Jerome S. Stanley, Esq., United States of America v. Oble Peters, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Matter of Jerome S. Stanley, Esq., United States of America v. Oble Peters, Jr., 598 F.2d 1210, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 13966 (9th Cir. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER RELIEVING COUNSEL AND IMPOSING REPRIMAND

Sua sponte the Court relieves Jerome S. Stanley as counsel of record for the defendant. A new attorney will be appointed under the Criminal Justice Act by a judge of this court. Also, an order will be filed properly authorizing the preparation of reporter’s transcript. The foregoing is subject to reconsideration if objection is filed within fourteen (14) days from date.

As a civil penalty for delaying the appeal of the defendant, who has now completed his sentence, the Court reprimands Jerome S. Stanley. Quite appropriately Mr. Stanley has offered not to come back to this Court. We accept the offer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER RELIEVING COUNSEL AND IMPOSING REPRIMAND

Sua sponte the Court relieves Jerome S. Stanley as counsel of record for the defendant. A new attorney will be appointed under the Criminal Justice Act by a judge of this court. Also, an order will be filed properly authorizing the preparation of reporter’s transcript. The foregoing is subject to reconsideration if objection is filed within fourteen (14) days from date.

As a civil penalty for delaying the appeal of the defendant, who has now completed his sentence, the Court reprimands Jerome S. Stanley. Quite appropriately Mr. Stanley has offered not to come back to this Court. We accept the offer.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

598 F.2d 1210, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 13966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-jerome-s-stanley-esq-united-states-of-america-v-oble-ca9-1979.