In the Matter of Jeffrey W. Harris

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 5, 2017
DocketS17Y1372
Status200

This text of In the Matter of Jeffrey W. Harris (In the Matter of Jeffrey W. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Matter of Jeffrey W. Harris, (Ga. 2017).

Opinion

301 Ga. 378 FINAL COPY

S17Y1372. IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY W. HARRIS.

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the Report and

Recommendation of special master Catherine Koura, who recommends

disbarring Respondent Jeffrey W. Harris (State Bar No. 330325) for his

violations of Rules 1.15 (I) and 1.15 (II). Neither Harris nor the Bar sought

review from the Review Panel and neither has filed exceptions to the Report and

Recommendation. This matter is now ripe for review.

The State Bar initiated this matter by filing a formal complaint. Despite

acknowledging receipt of the formal complaint, Harris, who has been a member

of the Bar since 1985, failed to file an answer and therefore the special master

found Harris to be in default under Bar Rule 4-212 (a). As a result of his default,

Harris was deemed to have admitted the following facts and violations: in the

course of his real estate practice, Harris received and administered funds

regarding the sale of real estate. In January and February 2015, a bank notified

the State Bar that Harris had issued nineteen (19) checks from his attorney trust account at a time when the account held insufficient funds to pay the checks.

During that same time frame, Harris deposited $12,500 of his personal funds to

cure the deficiencies in his trust account, but he made duplicate withdrawals of

attorney fees and did not maintain an adequate accounting of his trust account.

In short, Harris misappropriated trust funds and commingled those funds with

his own thereby violating both Rules 1.15 (I) and 1.15 (II), violations of which

may be punished by disbarment.

As is appropriate, the special master looked to the ABA Standards for

Imposing Lawyer Sanctions for guidance in determining the appropriate

sanction, see In the Matter of Morse, 266 Ga. 652 (470 SE2d 232) (1996), and

found in mitigation that Harris had no prior disciplinary history. See ABA

Standard 9.32 (a). In aggravation, the special master found that Harris acted

knowingly and caused injury or potential injury to his client, see ABA Standard

4.11, and that he had substantial experience in the practice of law. See ABA

Standard 9.22 (i). Noting that Harris ignored the gravity of these disciplinary

proceedings by his failure to respond, the special master concluded that Harris

should be disbarred based on the violations he is deemed to have admitted. See

In the Matter of Rose, 299 Ga. 665 (791 SE2d 1) (2016) (disbarred for admitted

2 violations of Rules 1.15 and 8.4 despite lack of prior disciplinary history where

attorney offered no mitigating explanation of his conduct); In the Matter of

Wathen, 290 Ga. 438 (721 SE2d 899) (2012) (disbarred for violations of several

Rules, including Rules 1.15 (I) and 1.15 (II), where attorney converted client

funds to his own use and showed indifference to making restitution, although

attorney’s partners made restitution to client); In the Matter of Goldberg, 281

Ga. 168 (635 SE2d 750) (2006) (disbarred for admitted violations of Rules 1.15

(I) and 1.15 (II) where attorney, who had prior disciplinary history, failed to

respond to formal complaint alleging a pattern of misconduct and multiple

offenses).

We have reviewed the record and agree that disbarment is the appropriate

punishment in this case for the reasons stated by the special master, particularly

in light of the fact that Harris offered no mitigating explanation of his behavior.

Accordingly, it hereby is ordered that the name of Jeffrey W. Harris be removed

from the rolls of attorneys licensed to practice law in the State of Georgia. He

is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

Disbarred. All the Justices concur.

3 Decided June 5, 2017.

Disbarment.

Paula J. Frederick, General Counsel State Bar, Jenny K. Mittleman,

Andreea N. Morrison, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of

Georgia.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of Morse
470 S.E.2d 232 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1996)
In the Matter of Goldberg
635 S.E.2d 750 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2006)
In re Wathen
721 S.E.2d 899 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2012)
In re Rose
791 S.E.2d 1 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2016)
In re Harris
801 S.E.2d 39 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In the Matter of Jeffrey W. Harris, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-jeffrey-w-harris-ga-2017.