In the Matter of Jdg

185 P.3d 555, 220 Or. App. 303
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMay 28, 2008
Docket070160378 A134835
StatusPublished

This text of 185 P.3d 555 (In the Matter of Jdg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Matter of Jdg, 185 P.3d 555, 220 Or. App. 303 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

185 P.3d 555 (2008)
220 Or. App. 303

In the Matter of J.D.G., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
J.D.G., Appellant.

070160378; A134835.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Submitted April 4, 2008.
Decided May 28, 2008.

Liza Langford, Portland, filed the brief for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Stacie F. Beckerman, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

*556 Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and SERCOMBE, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is unable to provide for his basic needs because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1)(d). The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state's concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. J. D. G.
185 P.3d 555 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 P.3d 555, 220 Or. App. 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-jdg-orctapp-2008.