in the Matter of Jay Harvey Morrey
This text of in the Matter of Jay Harvey Morrey (in the Matter of Jay Harvey Morrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided: February 1, 2016
S16Y0341. IN THE MATTER OF JAY HARVEY MORREY.
PER CURIAM.
This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the report and
recommendation of special master Matthew Tyler Smith, who recommends
acceptance of the petition for voluntary surrender of license filed by Respondent
Jay Harvey Morrey (State Bar No. 523494) after the issuance of a formal
complaint. See Bar Rule 4-227 (c). In his petition, Morrey sought to resolve the
formal complaint and another matter raised in a separate grievance.
Morrey, who was admitted to the Bar in 2002, admits that beginning in
2012 he undertook the representation of various individuals on a contingency
basis but failed to prepare formal retainer agreements, failed to provide the
clients with any writing describing his fees or expenses, and failed to maintain
adequate records regarding his fee agreements. Further, beginning in early
2014, Morrey admits that in multiple cases he appeared in court as the attorney
for a party in a garnishment action, although he had strong suspicions that the individual he represented was not in fact the actual party to the case and that he
undertook no investigation to dispel his suspicions. Morrey asserts that no
funds were ever released improperly in these garnishment cases and that
opposing counsel brought the identity issues to the court’s attention prior to the
hearings. Morrey admits that, by the above described actions, he has violated
Rules 1.1, 1.3, and 1.5 (c) (1). The maximum penalty for a violation of Rule 1.1
or 1.3 is disbarment, while the maximum penalty for a violation of Rule 1.5 (c)
(1) is a public reprimand.
Morrey, who is currently on administrative suspension for failure to pay
Bar dues and failure to meet continuing legal education requirements, asserts
that the lapses discussed above resulted from his ongoing battle with depression
and certain unspecified personal, emotional issues. Although he states that he
is on the road to recovery, he admits that he is currently unable to devote the
mental and emotional energy necessary to practice law. Therefore, he seeks to
resolve the disciplinary matters by voluntarily surrendering his license to
practice law in the State of Georgia. The State Bar raised no objection to
Morrey’s petition but noted that he has a prior disciplinary history. See In the
Matter of Morrey, 287 Ga. 819 (700 SE2d 382) (2010).
2 We have reviewed the records and agree to accept Morrey’s petition for
voluntary surrender of his license, which is tantamount to disbarment. See Bar
Rule 4-110 (f). It is hereby ordered that the name of Jay Harvey Morrey be
removed from the rolls of persons authorized to practice law in the State of
Georgia. Morrey is reminded of his duties pursuant to Bar Rule 4-219 (c).
Voluntary surrender of license accepted. All the Justices concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Matter of Jay Harvey Morrey, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-jay-harvey-morrey-ga-2016.