In the Matter of Jane I. Coogan
This text of In the Matter of Jane I. Coogan (In the Matter of Jane I. Coogan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Supreme Court No. 2025-331-M.P.
In the Matter of Jane I. Coogan. :
ORDER
This matter is before the Court pursuant to a petition for reciprocal discipline,
filed by this Court’s Disciplinary Counsel in accordance with Article III, Rule 14 of
the Supreme Court Rules of Disciplinary Procedure for Attorneys. The respondent,
Jane I. Coogan, was admitted to practice law in this state on September 24, 2008,
and was removed from the Master Roll of Attorneys on April 26, 2023, for
noncompliance with this Court’s mandatory continuing legal education annual
reporting requirements. The respondent also is admitted to the practice of law in the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts (“Commonwealth”).
On October 7, 2025, a single justice of the Supreme Judicial Court for the
Commonwealth issued a Memorandum of Law and Order of Term
Suspension/Partially Stayed (“Order”) against respondent, effective on November 7,
2024, suspending respondent’s license to practice law for a period of six (6) months,
with three (3) months stayed, for a period of three (3) months to be served, contingent
upon respondent taking a legal education course on a topic approved by the
Commonwealth’s Office of Bar Counsel; respondent’s mandated consultation with
the Commonwealth’s Law Office Management Assistance Program (“LOMAP”)
-1- regarding the e-management of her law practice; and her pledge to implement the
recommendations of LOMAP. The respondent has not yet been readmitted to the
practice of law in the Commonwealth.
Article III, Rule 14(a), entitled “Reciprocal discipline,” provides in pertinent
part: “Upon notification from any source that a lawyer within the jurisdiction of the
[Disciplinary] Board has been disciplined in another jurisdiction, [Disciplinary]
Counsel shall obtain a certified copy of the disciplinary order and file it with the
[C]ourt.” On October 29, 2024, Disciplinary Counsel filed a certified copy of the
Order with this Court along with her request that we impose reciprocal discipline.
On November 5, 2025, this Court issued an Order to respondent providing her
thirty days to assert any claim she may have that the reciprocal discipline should not
be imposed.
On December 8, 2025, respondent filed a response to the order to show cause,
assenting to this Court entering an identical order of reciprocal discipline but
requesting that the suspension imposed be made retroactive to the effective date of
her suspension in the Commonwealth.
This matter was presented before this Court at our conference on January 8,
2026. After a review of the record, we determine that respondent has failed to show
cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed. We also deny
respondent’s request for the discipline to be imposed retroactively.
-2- The respondent, Jane I. Coogan, is hereby suspended from the practice of law
in this state for six months, with three months stayed contingent on respondent
fulfilling the conditions of her stayed suspension in the Commonwealth.
As respondent is currently removed from the Master Roll in this state, and
therefore must apply for reinstatement, we order the effective date of her reciprocal
suspension to be the date this Court grants her readmission to the Master Roll in this
state. When respondent applies for reinstatement in this state, she shall report to
Disciplinary Counsel her progress with fulfilling the conditional terms of her stayed
suspension in the Commonwealth. If respondent does not fulfill the conditions of
the stay in the Commonwealth in a timely manner thus rendering the served
suspension in excess of three months, respondent shall immediately report that to
Disciplinary Counsel, and the additional portion of the served sentence in the
Commonwealth beyond three months shall likewise extend the length of her
suspension herein ordered.
Entered as an order of this Court this 23rd day of January 2026.
By Order,
/s/ Meredith A. Benoit Clerk -3- STATE OF RHODE ISLAND SUPREME COURT – CLERK’S OFFICE Licht Judicial Complex 250 Benefit Street Providence, RI 02903
ORDER COVER SHEET
Title of Case In the Matter of Jane I. Coogan.
Case Number No. 2025-331-M.P.
Date Order Filed January 23, 2026
Suttell, C.J., Goldberg, Robinson, Lynch Prata, and Justices Long, JJ.
Source of Appeal N/A
Judicial Officer from Lower Court N/A
For Petitioner:
Kerry Reilley Travers, Esq. Attorney(s) on Appeal Chief Disciplinary Counsel For Respondent:
Jane I. Coogan, pro se
SU-CMS-02B (revised November 2022)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In the Matter of Jane I. Coogan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-jane-i-coogan-ri-2026.