In the Matter of James J. O'Brien and Daniel L. Redmond, Jr., Individually and Trading as O'Brien & Redmond, Bankrupts. J. Paul Martin, Trustee

349 F.2d 417
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedAugust 17, 1965
Docket15183_1
StatusPublished

This text of 349 F.2d 417 (In the Matter of James J. O'Brien and Daniel L. Redmond, Jr., Individually and Trading as O'Brien & Redmond, Bankrupts. J. Paul Martin, Trustee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Matter of James J. O'Brien and Daniel L. Redmond, Jr., Individually and Trading as O'Brien & Redmond, Bankrupts. J. Paul Martin, Trustee, 349 F.2d 417 (3d Cir. 1965).

Opinion

349 F.2d 417

In the Matter of James J. O'BRIEN and Daniel L. Redmond, Jr., Individually and Trading as O'Brien & Redmond, Bankrupts.
J. Paul Martin, Trustee, Appellant.

No. 15183.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued June 8, 1965.

Decided August 17, 1965.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; John W. Lord, Jr., Judge.

Melvin Lashner, Adelman & Lavine, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

William T. Windsor, Jr., Saul, Ewing, Remick & Saul, Philadelphia, Pa., for Saul, Ewing, Remick & Saul.

Paul J. Donnelly, Philadelphia, Pa., for National Surety Corp.

Edward D. Barker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harrisburg, Pa. (John R. Rezzolla, Chief Counsel, Department of Highways, Walter E. Alessandroni, Atty. Gen., Harrisburg, Pa., on the brief), for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Anthony Roisman, Tax Division, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for United States of America.

Herbert A. Barton, Swartz, Campbell & Detweiler, Philadelphia, Pa., for Massachusetts Bonding Co. (now Hanover Insurance Co.)

S. Gordon Elkins, Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & Young, Philadelphia, Pa., for Globe Indemnity Co.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and KALODNER and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the briefs and the record in this case, as supplemented at our direction, following oral argument. We have weighed the arguments of the parties and have concluded that the contentions of the appellant-trustee are without merit. Consequently the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re O'Brien
349 F.2d 417 (Third Circuit, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
349 F.2d 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-james-j-obrien-and-daniel-l-redmo-ca3-1965.