in the Matter of James Edward Watkins, Sr
This text of in the Matter of James Edward Watkins, Sr (in the Matter of James Edward Watkins, Sr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
302 Ga. 226 FINAL COPY
S17Y1842. IN THE MATTER OF JAMES EDWARD WATKINS, SR.
PER CURIAM.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendations of the
special master, Joseph A. Boone, recommending that James Edward Watkins,
Sr. (State Bar No. 740430), a member of the State Bar of Georgia since 1996,
be disbarred for multiple derelictions related to his deficient representation and
abandonment of two unrelated clients. Watkins was served with the formal
complaints in these matters, but failed to file answers as required by Bar Rule
4-212 (a). The special master therefore found Watkins in default and found the
following facts admitted by default. See id.
The first client retained Watkins in March 2015 to represent her in
connection with a contempt action against her homeowners association
(“HOA”). The client paid Watkins $500 to represent her. Over several months,
the client unsuccessfully tried to contact Watkins for an update on her case. In July 2015, the client went to Watkins’s office to inquire about her case and,
dissatisfied with his lack of work on the case, asked for a refund. Watkins
replied to the client’s request by sending her a letter demanding she never come
to his office again. Subsequently, Watkins sent the client a bill for services, a
copy of a June 20, 2015 letter from him to the HOA, and a copy of an undated
contempt motion; the client was not copied on the June 20 letter allegedly sent
to the HOA. Watkins told the client that he filed the motion for contempt and
performed other work on the case that he did not do. Watkins never filed the
contempt motion, failed to communicate with the client, and failed to take any
action on the client’s behalf.
In November 2015, Watkins was appointed to represent the second client
at issue in a criminal case and entered an appearance. The client had an $8,000
bond at the time. Watkins filed a motion for bond reduction but failed to attend
the hearing on the motion. Watkins visited the client only one time in jail and
failed to respond to the client’s multiple telephone calls and written
correspondence. Watkins has not filed any other motions on the client’s behalf.
He failed to communicate with the client. He failed to take any other action on
the client’s behalf aside from filing the bond reduction motion. He failed to
2 communicate with the prosecutor regarding a plea offer on the basis that he was
unsure if he represents the client anymore; the prosecutor is unable to directly
contact the client because the client is still represented by Watkins. Watkins has
failed to properly withdraw from representing the client, and the client
apparently remains incarcerated and unindicted.
The special master concluded that by these actions, Watkins violated
Rules 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5 (a) (4), 1.16, 3.2, and 8.4 (a) (4) of the Georgia Rules of
Professional Conduct found in Bar Rule 4-102 (d). The maximum sanction for
a violation of Rules 1.4, 1.5 (a) (4), 1.16, and 3.2 is a public reprimand. The
maximum sanction for a violation of Rules 1.2, 1.3, and 8.4 (a) (4) is
disbarment. The special master noted that Watkins was disciplined with a letter
of admonition in 2015 for violating Rules 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, and 1.16 (d).
We agree with the special master that Watkins’s multiple offenses, prior
discipline, substantial experience in the practice of law, and disregard of the
disciplinary process are aggravating factors. We also agree that disbarment is
the appropriate sanction in these circumstances, especially considering
Watkins’s failure to make restitution to the first client and his abandonment of
the second client in a criminal matter, possibly resulting in a longer period of
3 incarceration. See In the Matter of Raulin, 299 Ga. 283, 283-284 (787 SE2d
691) (2016) (disbarring attorney who accepted $500 from client but failed to
diligently represent and communicate with client or provide refund); In the
Matter of Lea, 297 Ga. 797, 797-798 (778 SE2d 228) (2015) (disbarring
attorney who failed to file pleadings for, respond to, or refund fees to criminal
and civil clients); In the Matter of Evans, 289 Ga. 744, 744-745 (715 SE2d 131)
(2011) (disbarring attorney who accepted payments from clients, performed
some work in an untimely or incompetent manner, misrepresented to client that
he filed pleading that was never filed, became wholly unresponsive to clients,
and failed to return unearned fees); In the Matter of Thomas, 282 Ga. 514, 514-
515 (651 SE2d 740) (2007) (disbarring attorney who accepted payment from
clients, became unresponsive, misrepresented to client he filed pleading that was
never filed, abandoned client in bond modification case, and failed to refund
fees).
Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that the name of James Edward Watkins,
Sr., be removed from the rolls of persons authorized to practice law in the State
of Georgia. Watkins is reminded of his duties pursuant to Bar Rule 4-219 (c).
The State Bar’s General Counsel is hereby directed to contact the prosecutor and
4 court involved in Watkins’s second client’s criminal case to advise them of the
disposition of this matter and the need to promptly ensure new representation
for that client.
Disbarred. All the Justices concur.
Decided October 2, 2017.
Disbarment.
Paula J. Frederick, General Counsel State Bar, Jenny K. Mittelman,
Andreea N. Morrison, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of
Georgia.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Matter of James Edward Watkins, Sr, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-james-edward-watkins-sr-ga-2017.