In the Matter of Hutchinson

521 A.2d 676, 1987 D.C. App. LEXIS 536
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided March 10, 1987·No. 85-53·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the petitions of the Board on Professional Responsibility and the Bar Counsel for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and the reply of respondent thereto, it is

ORDERED by the merits division that the petitions for rehearing are denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this Court has voted to grant the petitions for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the petitions for rehearing en banc are granted and that the opinion of December 8, 1986, 518 A.2d 995, is hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the Court sitting en banc as soon as the business of the Court permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before March 16, 1987.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Matter of Hutchinson, 521 A.2d 676, 1987 D.C. App. LEXIS 536 (D.C. 1987).

521 A.2d 676 (In the Matter of Hutchinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Hessler
549 A.2d 700 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1988)
In Re Hutchinson
534 A.2d 919 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1987)