In the Matter of Henderson

Supreme Court of Georgia

In the Matter of Henderson

710 S.E.2d 124, 289 Ga. 135, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 1288, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 278

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 18, 2011

DocketS11Y0548

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 710 S.E.2d 124 (In the Matter of Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Matter of Henderson, 710 S.E.2d 124, 289 Ga. 135, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 1288, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 278 (Ga. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the petition for voluntary discipline filed by Edward C. Henderson, Jr. (Bar No. 345301) in which he seeks the imposition of a one-year suspension.

Henderson, who has been a member of the Bar since 1993, represented clients in three separate personal injury actions. He admits that in connection with his representation of his clients in each matter, he received settlement funds on behalf of his clients, but failed to timely pay the portions owing to the clients or to pay other expenses. Instead he used the funds for his personal use. With respect to two of the representations, he failed to deposit the funds in his attorney trust account and in one matter he failed to timely comply with a court order directing that he disburse the funds. Additionally, he failed to communicate with his clients about the disbursements and his failure to make the remaining disbursements. He has since paid the disbursements owing in two of the matters, but he has not finalized disbursements totaling $28,028 in one matter. Those disbursements were scheduled to be made by February 15, 2011.

By this conduct Henderson admits that he has violated Rules 1.3, 1.4, 1.15 (I) (a), (b), 1.15 (II) (a), (b), and 8.4 (a) (4), (a) (5). The maximum sanction for a violation of Rule 1.4 is a public reprimand and the maximum sanction for the remaining violations is disbarment. In mitigation, Henderson offers that he has cooperated in the disciplinary process by filing the petition for voluntary discipline, he regrets violating the disciplinary rules, he expresses his sincere remorse, and he has no prior disciplinary record. He states that the appropriate sanction is a suspension of one to two years and asks for the imposition of a one-year suspension.

The State Bar has responded that it cannot support the petition where Henderson has not yet made the final disbursements in connection with the final representation. We agree. Until Henderson has demonstrated that he has made the final disbursements owing, *136 this Court will not entertain the petition. Therefore, the Court hereby rejects the petition for voluntary discipline.

Decided April 18, 2011. Paula J. Frederick, General Counsel State Bar, Jonathan W. Hewett, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.

Petition for voluntary discipline rejected.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the petition for voluntary discipline filed by Edward C. Henderson, Jr. (Bar No. 345301) in which he seeks the imposition of a one-year suspension.

Henderson, who has been a member of the Bar since 1993, represented clients in three separate personal injury actions. He admits that in connection with his representation of his clients in each matter, he received settlement funds on behalf of his clients, but failed to timely pay the portions owing to the clients or to pay other expenses. Instead he used the funds for his personal use. With respect to two of the representations, he failed to deposit the funds in his attorney trust account and in one matter he failed to timely comply with a court order directing that he disburse the funds. Additionally, he failed to communicate with his clients about the disbursements and his failure to make the remaining disbursements. He has since paid the disbursements owing in two of the matters, but he has not finalized disbursements totaling $28,028 in one matter. Those disbursements were scheduled to be made by February 15, 2011.

By this conduct Henderson admits that he has violated Rules 1.3, 1.4, 1.15 (I) (a), (b), 1.15 (II) (a), (b), and 8.4 (a) (4), (a) (5). The maximum sanction for a violation of Rule 1.4 is a public reprimand and the maximum sanction for the remaining violations is disbarment. In mitigation, Henderson offers that he has cooperated in the disciplinary process by filing the petition for voluntary discipline, he regrets violating the disciplinary rules, he expresses his sincere remorse, and he has no prior disciplinary record. He states that the appropriate sanction is a suspension of one to two years and asks for the imposition of a one-year suspension.

The State Bar has responded that it cannot support the petition where Henderson has not yet made the final disbursements in connection with the final representation. We agree. Until Henderson has demonstrated that he has made the final disbursements owing, *136 this Court will not entertain the petition. Therefore, the Court hereby rejects the petition for voluntary discipline.

Decided April 18, 2011. Paula J. Frederick, General Counsel State Bar, Jonathan W. Hewett, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.

Petition for voluntary discipline rejected.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

710 S.E.2d 124, 289 Ga. 135, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 1288, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-henderson-ga-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack