In the Matter of Harry v. Cardoni

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In the Matter of Harry v. Cardoni

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 12, 2020·No. 1668 DD3·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 1668 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 :

HARRY VINCENT CARDONI : No. 210 DB 2010 : : Attorney Registration No. 33985 :

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT : (Luzerne County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 12th day of March, 2020, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and

processing of the Petition for Reinstatement. See Pa.R.D.E. 218(f).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 1668 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 :

HARRY VINCENT CARDONI : No. 210 DB 2010 : : Attorney Registration No. 33985 :

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT : (Luzerne County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 12th day of March, 2020, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and

processing of the Petition for Reinstatement. See Pa.R.D.E. 218(f).

In the Matter of Harry v. Cardoni, (Pa. 2020).

Pincite

In the Matter of Harry v. Cardoni (In the Matter of Harry v. Cardoni) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.