In the Matter of Hamo

889 A.2d 1160, 585 Pa. 641, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 3258
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 1, 2005
DocketNo. 1056 DISC 3
StatusPublished

This text of 889 A.2d 1160 (In the Matter of Hamo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Matter of Hamo, 889 A.2d 1160, 585 Pa. 641, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 3258 (Pa. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of December, 2005, George R. Hamo having been suspended from the practice of law in the State of Michigan for a period of 120 days by Order of the State of Michigan Attorney Discipline Board dated March 7, 2005, and corrected by Order dated March 9, 2005; the said George R. Hamo having been directed on September 20, 2005, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and upon consideration of the responses filed, it is

ORDERED that George R. Hamo is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of 120 days, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
889 A.2d 1160, 585 Pa. 641, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 3258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-hamo-pa-2005.