Home/Supreme Court of South Carolina/In the Matter of Hall

In the Matter of Hall

659 S.E.2d 158, 377 S.C. 103, 2008 S.C. LEXIS 94
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMarch 19, 2008
StatusPublished

This text of 659 S.E.2d 158 (In the Matter of Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Matter of Hall, 659 S.E.2d 158, 377 S.C. 103, 2008 S.C. LEXIS 94 (S.C. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

On October 9, 2006, the Court definitely suspended petitioner from the practice of law for nine months In the Matter of Hall, 370 S.C. 496, 636 S.E.2d 621 (2006). In April 2007, he filed a Petition for Reinstatement and the matter was referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness (CCF). The CCF has filed a Report and Recommendation recommending the Court grant the Petition for Reinstatement. Neither petitioner nor the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) filed any exceptions to the CCF’s Report and Recommendation.

The Court grants the Petition for Reinstatement. Petitioner is hereby reinstated to the practice of law.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

JEAN H. TOAL, C.J., JOHN H. WALLER, JR., COSTA M. PLEICONES, and DONALD W. BEATTY, JJ. MOORE, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Hall
636 S.E.2d 621 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
659 S.E.2d 158, 377 S.C. 103, 2008 S.C. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-hall-sc-2008.