In the Matter of Haley

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In the Matter of Haley

625 S.E.2d 226, 367 S.C. 70

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided January 10, 2006·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Petitioner was suspended on November 14, 2005, for a period of thirty days. He has now filed an affidavit requesting reinstatement pursuant to Rule 32, of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413, SCACR.

The request is granted and he is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in this state.

Jean H. Toal, Chief Justice BY /s/ Daniel E. Shearouse Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Petitioner was suspended on November 14, 2005, for a period of thirty days. He has now filed an affidavit requesting reinstatement pursuant to Rule 32, of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413, SCACR.

The request is granted and he is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in this state.

Jean H. Toal, Chief Justice BY /s/ Daniel E. Shearouse Clerk

In the Matter of Haley, 625 S.E.2d 226, 367 S.C. 70 (S.C. 2006).

Pincite

625 S.E.2d 226 (In the Matter of Haley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.