In the Matter of Hackman

293 S.W.3d 454, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 919, 2008 WL 2652233
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 8, 2008
DocketED 90554
StatusPublished

This text of 293 S.W.3d 454 (In the Matter of Hackman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Matter of Hackman, 293 S.W.3d 454, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 919, 2008 WL 2652233 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Leona Hackman appeals from a trial court judgment granting letters of conser-vatorship and appointing a conservator for her estate. Ms. Hackman argues that the trial court erred in granting the letters of conservatorship and appointing a conservator because there was not clear and convincing evidence of her disability. She further argues that the trial court did not apply the “least restrictive environment principle” in appointing a conservator.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schultz v. Division of Employment Security
293 S.W.3d 454 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
293 S.W.3d 454, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 919, 2008 WL 2652233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-hackman-moctapp-2008.