In the Matter of Gregory Bynner JONES, Sr., Bankrupt

665 F.2d 60, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 22891
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 4, 1982·No. 81-3322·Published·Cited by 37 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal presents the question wheth- zr an attorney for the bankrupt is entitled :o compensation out of the bankrupt estate for services rendered to the bankrupt in defeating the oppositions to discharge filed by several creditors. The trial court held that attorneys’ fees for such services are not payable out of the estate. We agree. Because the bankruptcy at issue in this appeal was filed prior to the effective date of the new bankruptcy code, prior law applies. Under the terms of the previous Bankruptcy Act, attorneys’ fees are allowed only to compensate for professional services rendered in connection with the preserva-, tion of the estate. 11 U.S.C. § 104(a)(1), repealed October 1, 1979. The granting or denial of a discharge is personal to the bankrupt and has nothing to do with the preservation of the estate. This court has stated that “legal services designed to benefit the bankrupt personally may not be compensable out of the estate.” In Re Orbit Liquor Store, 439 F.2d 1351, 1354 (5th Cir. 1971). The Second and Tenth Circuits have specifically held that attorneys’ fees related to defending against objections to the discharge are not payable out of the estate. In Re Rothman, 85 F.2d 51 (2d Cir. 1936), Lewis v. Fitzgerald, 295 F.2d 877, 879 (10th Cir. 1961). This view is hereby adopted as the rule of the Fifth Circuit.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Matter of Gregory Bynner JONES, Sr., Bankrupt, 665 F.2d 60, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 22891 (5th Cir. 1982).

665 F.2d 60 (In the Matter of Gregory Bynner JONES, Sr., Bankrupt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Todd Benjamin Schlomer
W.D. Texas, 2025
Victor P. Kearney
D. New Mexico, 2019
In Re Rancourt
207 B.R. 338 (D. New Hampshire, 1997)
In Re Dawson
180 B.R. 478 (E.D. Texas, 1994)
Mayer, Glassman & Gaines v. Washam (In Re Hanson)
172 B.R. 67 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
In Re Kingsbury
146 B.R. 581 (D. Maine, 1992)
Wootton v. Ravkind (In Re Dixon)
143 B.R. 671 (N.D. Texas, 1992)
In Re Office Products of America, Inc.
136 B.R. 983 (W.D. Texas, 1992)
In Re Bennett
133 B.R. 374 (N.D. Texas, 1991)
In re Easter
105 B.R. 724 (S.D. Florida, 1989)
In Re Storms
101 B.R. 645 (S.D. California, 1989)
In Re Marker
100 B.R. 569 (N.D. Alabama, 1989)
In Re Holden
101 B.R. 573 (N.D. Iowa, 1989)
Stewart v. Law Offices of Dennis Olson
93 B.R. 91 (N.D. Texas, 1988)
Matter of Crisp
92 B.R. 885 (W.D. Missouri, 1988)
In Re Reed
95 B.R. 626 (E.D. Arkansas, 1988)
In Re Bernard
88 B.R. 105 (N.D. Texas, 1988)
In Re Weingarden
84 B.R. 691 (S.D. California, 1988)
In Re Leff
84 B.R. 72 (N.D. Texas, 1988)
In Re Global International Airways, Corp.
82 B.R. 520 (W.D. Missouri, 1988)