In the Matter of Greefeld

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In the Matter of Greefeld

870 A.2d 1193, 2005 D.C. App. LEXIS 135

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 24, 2005

DocketNo. 05-BS-154

StatusPublished

This text of 870 A.2d 1193 (In the Matter of Greefeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Matter of Greefeld, 870 A.2d 1193, 2005 D.C. App. LEXIS 135 (D.C. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the petition of the Board on Professional Responsibility pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(c), to suspend respondent indefinitely based on disability and respondent having interposed no objection thereto, it is

ORDERED that respondent is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, effective immediately, and that any pending matters be held in abeyance until further order of the Court pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(e). Respondent’s reinstatement to the District of Columbia Bar shall be in accordance with the provisions of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(g). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall file an affidavit in compliance with D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) with the Court and the Board and shall serve a copy of the affidavit on Bar Counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the petition of the Board on Professional Responsibility pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(c), to suspend respondent indefinitely based on disability and respondent having interposed no objection thereto, it is

ORDERED that respondent is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, effective immediately, and that any pending matters be held in abeyance until further order of the Court pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(e). Respondent’s reinstatement to the District of Columbia Bar shall be in accordance with the provisions of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(g). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall file an affidavit in compliance with D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) with the Court and the Board and shall serve a copy of the affidavit on Bar Counsel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

870 A.2d 1193, 2005 D.C. App. LEXIS 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-greefeld-dc-2005.