In the Matter of Gramkow

Supreme Court of Kansas

In the Matter of Gramkow

234 P.3d 804, 290 Kan. 801, 2010 Kan. LEXIS 430

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedJuly 8, 2010

DocketBar Docket 22,138

StatusPublished

This text of 234 P.3d 804 (In the Matter of Gramkow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Matter of Gramkow, 234 P.3d 804, 290 Kan. 801, 2010 Kan. LEXIS 430 (kan 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

In a letter signed June 22, 2010, addressed to the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, respondent Jeremiah C. Gramkow, an attorney admitted to the practice of law in the state of Kansas, voluntarily surrendered Ills license k> prilC'til'O lSW 111 ^ ^ preme Court Rule 217 (2009 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 353).

At the time the respondent surrendered his license, a panel hearing on two complaints was pending in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 211 (2009 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 321). The complaints alleged that respondent violated Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1 (2009 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 410), 1.2 (2009 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 421), 1.3 (2009 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 426), 1.6 (2009 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 468), 1.9(c)(2) (2009 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 490), 1.15(d)(1) (2009 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 507) and 8.4 (2009 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 602).

Additionally, a third case that involved allegations of violations of Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct 1.5 (2009 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 460) and 1.8 (2009 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 483) was under investigation at the time respondent surrendered his license.

This court, having examined the files of the office of the Disciplinary Administrator, finds the surrender of the respondent’s license should be accepted and that the respondent should be disbarred.

It Is Therefore Ordered that Jeremiah C. Gramkow be and is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in Kansas and his license and privilege to practice law are hereby revoked.

It Is Further Ordered that the Clerk of the Appellate Courts strike the name of Jeremiah C. Gramkow from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Kansas.

It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports, that the costs herein shall be assessed to the *802 respondent, and that the respondent forthwith shall comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (2009 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 361).

Dated this 8th day of July, 2010.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a letter signed June 22, 2010, addressed to the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, respondent Jeremiah C. Gramkow, an attorney admitted to the practice of law in the state of Kansas, voluntarily surrendered Ills license k> prilC'til'O lSW 111 ^ ^ preme Court Rule 217 (2009 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 353).

At the time the respondent surrendered his license, a panel hearing on two complaints was pending in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 211 (2009 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 321). The complaints alleged that respondent violated Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1 (2009 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 410), 1.2 (2009 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 421), 1.3 (2009 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 426), 1.6 (2009 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 468), 1.9(c)(2) (2009 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 490), 1.15(d)(1) (2009 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 507) and 8.4 (2009 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 602).

Additionally, a third case that involved allegations of violations of Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct 1.5 (2009 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 460) and 1.8 (2009 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 483) was under investigation at the time respondent surrendered his license.

This court, having examined the files of the office of the Disciplinary Administrator, finds the surrender of the respondent’s license should be accepted and that the respondent should be disbarred.

It Is Therefore Ordered that Jeremiah C. Gramkow be and is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in Kansas and his license and privilege to practice law are hereby revoked.

It Is Further Ordered that the Clerk of the Appellate Courts strike the name of Jeremiah C. Gramkow from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Kansas.

It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports, that the costs herein shall be assessed to the *802 respondent, and that the respondent forthwith shall comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (2009 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 361).

Dated this 8th day of July, 2010.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 P.3d 804, 290 Kan. 801, 2010 Kan. LEXIS 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-gramkow-kan-2010.