In the Matter of Gertner

16 A.3d 350, 205 N.J. 468, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 423
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 7, 2011·No. D-81 September Term 2010, 067734·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 10-332, concluding that MARK GERTNER of SOUTH ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.8(a) (conflict of interest—prohibited business transaction with a client), and RPC 1.15(a) (failure to safeguard client funds), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARK GERTNER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Matter of Gertner, 16 A.3d 350, 205 N.J. 468, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 423 (N.J. 2011).

16 A.3d 350 (In the Matter of Gertner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Matter of Strait
16 A.3d 350 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2011)