In the Matter of Gantz

937 N.E.2d 1203, 2010 Ind. LEXIS 790, 2010 WL 4940047
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 3, 2010
Docket41S00-0805-DI-274
StatusPublished

This text of 937 N.E.2d 1203 (In the Matter of Gantz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Matter of Gantz, 937 N.E.2d 1203, 2010 Ind. LEXIS 790, 2010 WL 4940047 (Ind. 2010).

Opinion

PUBLISHED ORDER ACCEPTING RESIGNATION AND CONCLUDING PROCEEDING

Respondent has tendered to this Court a resignation from the bar of this State, pursuant to Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 23(17).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the resignation from the bar of this State tendered by Respondent is accepted effective immediately. The Clerk of this Court is directed to record Respondent's resignation on the Roll of Attorneys. Respondent shall fulfill all the applicable duties under Admission and Discipline Rule 23(26).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any attorney disciplinary proceedings pending against Respondent are hereby dismissed as moot because of Respondent's resignation from the bar of this State.

Respondent shall be ineligible to petition for reinstatement to the practice of law for five years from the date of this order. See Admis. Disc. R. 28(4)(a). Approval of a petition for reinstatement is discretionary and requires clear and convincing evidence of the petitioner's remorse, rehabilitation, and fitness to practice law. See Admis. Disc. R. 28(4)(b).

The Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this Order to the hearing officer if one has been appointed, to the parties or their respective attorneys, and to all other entities entitled to notice under Admission and Discipline Rule 23(8)(d). The Clerk is further directed to post this order to the

Court's website, and Thomson Reuters is directed to publish a copy of this order in the bound volumes of this Court's decisions.

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Automobile Mutual Insurance Co. v. Flexdar, Inc.
937 N.E.2d 1203 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
937 N.E.2d 1203, 2010 Ind. LEXIS 790, 2010 WL 4940047, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-gantz-ind-2010.