In the Matter of G. Douglas and Mary Tibbitts, Bankrupt v. James E. Cussen, Trustee

456 F.2d 1314
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 23, 1972
Docket25814
StatusPublished

This text of 456 F.2d 1314 (In the Matter of G. Douglas and Mary Tibbitts, Bankrupt v. James E. Cussen, Trustee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Matter of G. Douglas and Mary Tibbitts, Bankrupt v. James E. Cussen, Trustee, 456 F.2d 1314 (9th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On this appeal from two bankruptcy orders, we affirm.

We conclude that the finding of un-feasibility of an arrangement plan was not clearly erroneous.

The objection as to adequate notice to the bankrupts and creditors was not raised below. It is not a case of no notice. Thus, we do not think it presents here a naked question of power to act.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
456 F.2d 1314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-g-douglas-and-mary-tibbitts-bankrupt-v-james-e-cussen-ca9-1972.