In the Matter of G. Douglas and Mary Tibbitts, Bankrupt v. James E. Cussen, Trustee
456 F.2d 1314
Opinion
On this appeal from two bankruptcy orders, we affirm.
We conclude that the finding of un-feasibility of an arrangement plan was not clearly erroneous.
The objection as to adequate notice to the bankrupts and creditors was not raised below. It is not a case of no notice. Thus, we do not think it presents here a naked question of power to act.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In the Matter of G. Douglas and Mary Tibbitts, Bankrupt v. James E. Cussen, Trustee, 456 F.2d 1314 (9th Cir. 1972).
456 F.2d 1314 (In the Matter of G. Douglas and Mary Tibbitts, Bankrupt v. James E. Cussen, Trustee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.