In the Matter of Free

717 S.E.2d 480, 290 Ga. 75, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 3418, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 874
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 7, 2011
DocketS11Y1937
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 717 S.E.2d 480 (In the Matter of Free) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Matter of Free, 717 S.E.2d 480, 290 Ga. 75, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 3418, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 874 (Ga. 2011).

Opinion

Per curiam.

This matter is before the Court on the petition for voluntary discipline filed by Benjamin C. Free (State Bar No. 275160) pursuant to Bar Rule 4-227 (b) (2), in which he seeks a Review Panel reprimand for his violations of Rules 1.3, 1.4, 1.16 (d), and 8.1 of the *76 Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct found in Bar Rule 4-102 (d).

Decided November 7, 2011. Paula J. Frederick, General Counsel State Bar, A. M. Christina Petrig, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.

Free, who became a member of the Bar in 1995, admits that he was retained to represent a client in 2008 in a prosecution for driving under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or other intoxicating substances and was paid $2,500. Free did not return the client’s phone calls or speak with the client about the case after the initial meeting. Free appeared two hours late for the call of the case and had not notified his client or the court that he would be late. On May 8, 2009, the client terminated him and requested a refund of the fee and a return of the file. Free did not refund the fee and did not return the file until after the client filed a grievance with the State Bar. On September 21, 2011, Free did pay the client the $1,250 awarded to him in a fee arbitration proceeding. Free admits that in his initial response to the client’s grievance, he misrepresented facts, including court dates and the reason that a continuance had been granted in the client’s case. He believed his response to be accurate when he submitted it, but after he made a further review of his file and calendar when the grievance went forward, he corrected his initial response. In mitigation, Free states he has not had any prior discipline and that he was going through a divorce, which negatively affected his handling of the client’s case.

The State Bar has indicated that it has no objection to the petition and agrees that the requested level of discipline is appropriate.

Having reviewed the record, we conclude that a Review Panel reprimand is the appropriate sanction in this case, and we therefore accept the petition for voluntary discipline. Accordingly, the Court hereby orders that Benjamin C. Free receive a Review Panel reprimand in accordance with Bar Rules 4-102 (b) (4) and 4-220 for his admitted violations of Rules 1.3, 1.4, 1.16 (d), and 8.1.

Petition for voluntary discipline accepted. Review Panel reprimand.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of William L. Kirby
304 Ga. 628 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2018)
In re Kirby
820 S.E.2d 729 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2018)
In re Free
737 S.E.2d 690 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2013)
In the Matter of Fuller
717 S.E.2d 477 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
717 S.E.2d 480, 290 Ga. 75, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 3418, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-free-ga-2011.