In THE MATTER OF FRANKLIN v. Miner
850 N.E.2d 1163, 7 N.Y.3d 735, 818 N.Y.S.2d 188, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 1433
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 NY 284, 297-298 [1929, Cardozo, Ch.J.]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In THE MATTER OF FRANKLIN v. Miner, 850 N.E.2d 1163, 7 N.Y.3d 735, 818 N.Y.S.2d 188, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 1433 (N.Y. 2006).
850 N.E.2d 1163 (In THE MATTER OF FRANKLIN v. Miner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dalton v. Harleysville Worcester Mutual Insurance
557 F.3d 88 (Second Circuit, 2009)
Davis v. MELNICKE
850 N.E.2d 1162 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)