In THE MATTER OF FRANKLIN v. Miner
850 N.E.2d 1163, 7 N.Y.3d 735, 818 N.Y.S.2d 188, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 1433
This text of 850 N.E.2d 1163 (In THE MATTER OF FRANKLIN v. Miner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In THE MATTER OF FRANKLIN v. Miner, 850 N.E.2d 1163, 7 N.Y.3d 735, 818 N.Y.S.2d 188, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 1433 (N.Y. 2006).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 NY 284, 297-298 [1929, Cardozo, Ch.J.]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Dalton v. Harleysville Worcester Mutual Insurance
557 F.3d 88 (Second Circuit, 2009)
Davis v. MELNICKE
850 N.E.2d 1162 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
850 N.E.2d 1163, 7 N.Y.3d 735, 818 N.Y.S.2d 188, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 1433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-franklin-v-miner-ny-2006.