in the Matter of F.J.R.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 2, 2009·No. 11-07-00342-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion filed July 2, 2009

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________

No. 11-07-00342-CV __________

IN THE MATTER OF F.J.R.

On Appeal from the County Court at Law sitting as Juvenile Court

Midland County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 5619

MEMORANDUM OPINION The jury found that F.J.R. engaged in delinquent conduct by committing the offense of sexual assault. The trial court committed appellant to the care and custody of the Texas Youth Commission for an indeterminate period of time not to exceed his twenty-first birthday. We affirm. The record reflects that appellant filed a motion for the appointment of an interpreter and that the motion was granted. The record further reflects that the same “certified, qualified, State- authorized interpreter” was present in the courtroom and assisted appellant throughout the proceedings without objection. In his sole issue on appeal, appellant contends that the trial court committed reversible error because the interpreter was not given an oath until appellant was sworn in as the final witness in the three-day trial. The State argues that appellant has failed to preserve his complaint for appellate review. We agree. The record before this court is silent as to the oath administered to the interpreter. During pretrial proceedings, the trial court described the interpreter as a “certified, qualified, State- authorized interpreter.” The same interpreter served appellant throughout the trial court proceedings. Failure to timely object results in failure to preserve a complaint for appellate review. TEX . R. APP . P. 33. The waiver applies to failure to object to an unsworn witness or an interpreter. Beck v. State, 719 S.W.2d 205, 213 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986); Castillo v. State, 807 S.W.2d 8 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1991, pet. ref’d); Lara v. State, 761 S.W.2d 481 (Tex. App.—Eastland 1988, no pet.). The issue is overruled. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

JIM R. WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE

July 2, 2009 Do not publish. See TEX . R. APP . P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., McCall, J., and Strange, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in the Matter of F.J.R., (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

in the Matter of F.J.R. (in the Matter of F.J.R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lara v. State
761 S.W.2d 481 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Castillo v. State
807 S.W.2d 8 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Beck v. State
719 S.W.2d 205 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1986)