In the Matter of Ernest Paul and Emil Paul, Individually and Trading as Philadelphia China Company, Bankrupts, William T. Gennetti, Trustee

Third Circuit

In the Matter of Ernest Paul and Emil Paul, Individually and Trading as Philadelphia China Company, Bankrupts, William T. Gennetti, Trustee

351 F.2d 311, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 4221

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedOctober 22, 1965

Docket15257_1

StatusPublished

This text of 351 F.2d 311 (In the Matter of Ernest Paul and Emil Paul, Individually and Trading as Philadelphia China Company, Bankrupts, William T. Gennetti, Trustee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Matter of Ernest Paul and Emil Paul, Individually and Trading as Philadelphia China Company, Bankrupts, William T. Gennetti, Trustee, 351 F.2d 311, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 4221 (3d Cir. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the district court that the referee in bankruptcy had a reasonable basis for concluding that Emil Paul was not a knowing participant in the complained of financial statement and statement of affairs transactions in this bankruptcy.

That part of the order of the district court affirming the order of the Referee, granting discharge to Emil Paul, which is the only part of said order from which appeal has been taken, wilí be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the district court that the referee in bankruptcy had a reasonable basis for concluding that Emil Paul was not a knowing participant in the complained of financial statement and statement of affairs transactions in this bankruptcy.

That part of the order of the district court affirming the order of the Referee, granting discharge to Emil Paul, which is the only part of said order from which appeal has been taken, wilí be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

351 F.2d 311, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 4221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-ernest-paul-and-emil-paul-individually-and-trading-as-ca3-1965.