In the Matter of Edward G. Brissette, Bankrupt, Gene Paul Master, Bankrupt, and Michael Anthony Simon, Bankrupt

Ninth Circuit

In the Matter of Edward G. Brissette, Bankrupt, Gene Paul Master, Bankrupt, and Michael Anthony Simon, Bankrupt

568 F.2d 473

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 25, 1977·No. 75-3288·Published

Opinion

ORDER

We had no occasion to and we did not reach the question of the effect of the Consumer Credit Protection Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 1671 et seq. (1971)) in states with wage earner exemption schemes different from California’s, nor do we express any opinion upon the preemptive effect, if any, of the Consumer Credit Protection Act, on such other state laws which Section 6 of the Bankruptcy Act adopts.

The petitions for rehearing are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

We had no occasion to and we did not reach the question of the effect of the Consumer Credit Protection Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 1671 et seq. (1971)) in states with wage earner exemption schemes different from California’s, nor do we express any opinion upon the preemptive effect, if any, of the Consumer Credit Protection Act, on such other state laws which Section 6 of the Bankruptcy Act adopts.

The petitions for rehearing are denied.

In the Matter of Edward G. Brissette, Bankrupt, Gene Paul Master, Bankrupt, and Michael Anthony Simon, Bankrupt, 568 F.2d 473 (9th Cir. 1977).

Pincite

568 F.2d 473 (In the Matter of Edward G. Brissette, Bankrupt, Gene Paul Master, Bankrupt, and Michael Anthony Simon, Bankrupt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related