in the Matter of E. M. W. Jr.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 21, 1993
Docket03-92-00545-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Matter of E. M. W. Jr. (in the Matter of E. M. W. Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Matter of E. M. W. Jr., (Tex. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS,


AT AUSTIN




NO. 3-92-545-CV


IN THE MATTER OF E. M. W. JR.,


APPELLANT





FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT


NO. J-12,321, HONORABLE F. SCOTT McCOWN, JUDGE PRESIDING




PER CURIAM

This is a dismissal for want of prosecution.

The trial court rendered the order underlying this appeal on September 21, 1992. Appellant did not file a motion for new trial. The record in the above cause was due to be filed in this Court on November 20, 1992. Tex. R. App. P. 54(a). Appellant filed an untimely motion for extension of time to file the transcript on December 11, 1992. Tex. R. App. P. 54(c).

If the appellant fails to file either the transcript or the statement of facts within the prescribed time, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 54(a). Appellant has not filed the transcript. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Veale v. Rose, 688 S.W.2d 600 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 1984, writ ref'd n.r.e.).



[Before Chief Justice Carroll, Justices Aboussie and Jones]

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: April 21, 1993

[Do Not Publish]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Veale v. Rose
688 S.W.2d 600 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Matter of E. M. W. Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-e-m-w-jr-texapp-1993.