in the Matter of E. M. W. Jr.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 21, 1993·No. 03-92-00545-CV·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS,


AT AUSTIN




NO. 3-92-545-CV


IN THE MATTER OF E. M. W. JR.,


APPELLANT





FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT


NO. J-12,321, HONORABLE F. SCOTT McCOWN, JUDGE PRESIDING




PER CURIAM

This is a dismissal for want of prosecution.

The trial court rendered the order underlying this appeal on September 21, 1992. Appellant did not file a motion for new trial. The record in the above cause was due to be filed in this Court on November 20, 1992. Tex. R. App. P. 54(a). Appellant filed an untimely motion for extension of time to file the transcript on December 11, 1992. Tex. R. App. P. 54(c).

If the appellant fails to file either the transcript or the statement of facts within the prescribed time, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 54(a). Appellant has not filed the transcript. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Veale v. Rose, 688 S.W.2d 600 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 1984, writ ref'd n.r.e.).



[Before Chief Justice Carroll, Justices Aboussie and Jones]

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: April 21, 1993

[Do Not Publish]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in the Matter of E. M. W. Jr., (Tex. Ct. App. 1993).

in the Matter of E. M. W. Jr. (in the Matter of E. M. W. Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Veale v. Rose
688 S.W.2d 600 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1984)