in the Matter of Dolores Anselmo, Philip Ross, as Industrial Commissioner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

in the Matter of Dolores Anselmo, Philip Ross, as Industrial Commissioner

85 A.D.2d 938, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16786

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 14, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 85 A.D.2d 938 (in the Matter of Dolores Anselmo, Philip Ross, as Industrial Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in the Matter of Dolores Anselmo, Philip Ross, as Industrial Commissioner, 85 A.D.2d 938, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16786 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion pursuant to section 800.12 of the Rules of Practice [22 NYCRR 800.12] for permission to prosecute an appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board dated January 12, 1979, denied, without costs, and appeal dismissed. Pursuant to section 800.12 of the Rules of Practice, a motion for permission to prosecute an appeal deemed abandoned must be supported by a showing of reasonable excuse for the delay and facts showing merit to the appeal. Appellants have failed to make such a showing. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Yesawich, Jr., Weiss and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion pursuant to section 800.12 of the Rules of Practice [22 NYCRR 800.12] for permission to prosecute an appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board dated January 12, 1979, denied, without costs, and appeal dismissed. Pursuant to section 800.12 of the Rules of Practice, a motion for permission to prosecute an appeal deemed abandoned must be supported by a showing of reasonable excuse for the delay and facts showing merit to the appeal. Appellants have failed to make such a showing. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Yesawich, Jr., Weiss and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 A.D.2d 938, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-dolores-anselmo-philip-ross-as-industrial-commissioner-nyappdiv-1981.