In the Matter of Dereck Lee Clive

CourtSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands
DecidedNovember 18, 2020
DocketSX-19-CV-593
StatusPublished

This text of In the Matter of Dereck Lee Clive (In the Matter of Dereck Lee Clive) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of The Virgin Islands primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Matter of Dereck Lee Clive, (visuper 2020).

Opinion

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS

DIVISION OF ST. CROIX IN THE MATTER OF DEREK LEE CLIVE an Civil No. SX-19-CV-593 ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN | JUDGMENT CITE AS: 2020 VI SUPER 94P Appearances:

Derek Lee Clive Oliver, Pro se

MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLOCKS, Presiding Judge

ql THIS MATTER came before the Court on Petitioner Derek Lee Clive Oliver’s

(hereinafter “Petitioner”) petition for filing foreign judgment, filed on November 22, 2019. BACKGROUND

q2 In his petition, Petitioner petitioned the Court to domesticate a “Decree/Confirm Gender

Change and Order Amendment of Birth Certificate of Person Born Outside Connecticut” from the

State of Connecticut, Wallingford Probate Court, dated May 21, 2019 (hereinafter “Connecticut

Order’), whereby the Connecticut court stated:

q3 On the petition to confirm the petitioner’s change in gender and enter an order to amend the petitioner’s original birth certificate to reflect the gender change, as in the record more fully appears,

After due hearing, the Court finds that:

The petitioner resides in the probate district.

The petitioner was giving in accordance with the order of notice previously entered. The petitioner was born on October 16, 1991 in St. Croix, Virgin Islands.

The petitioner’s original birth certificate lists the sex of the petitioner as female.

The petitioner has presented sufficient evidence that the petitioner’s gender differs from the sex designated on the original birth certificate, including a notarized affidavit from a licensed physician advanced practice registered nurse or a psychologist that the petitioner In the Matter of Derek Lee Clive Oliver

SX-19-CV-593

Memorandum Opinion 2020 VISUPER 94P Page 2 of 7

has undergone surgical, hormonal or other treatment clinically appropriate for the petitioner for the purpose of gender transition.

Wherefore it is ordered and decreed that:

The petitioner’s gender differs from the sex designated on the petitioner’s original birth certificate.

The court orders that the petitioner’s original birth certificate be amended to reflect that the petitioner is male. The petitioner shall transmit a copy of this decree to the registration authority of the petitioner’s place of birth.

As such, Petitioner requested the Court to “recognize and enforce the [Connecticut Order] ordering the Virgin Islands Department of Health, St. Croix District, Office of Vital Records and Statistics to amend Petitioner’s birth certificate to reflect that he is male.” (Petition, p. 1) In support of his petition, Petitioner attached a copy of the Connecticut Order and an affidavit of Petitioner, dated November 19, 2019. STANDARD OF LAW q4 The enforcement of foreign judgments in the Virgin Islands is governed by the Virgin Islands Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act, Virgin Islands Code, Title 5, section 551, et seq. Title 5, section 553 of the Virgin Islands Code provides: A copy of any foreign judgment authenticated in accordance with an act of Congress or the statutes of the United States Virgin Islands may be filed in the Office of the Clerk of the Superior Court. The Clerk shall treat the foreign judgment in the same manner as a judgment of the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands. A judgment so filed shall have the same effect and shall be subject to the same procedures, defenses and proceedings for reopening, vacating, or staying as a judgment of the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands and may be enforced or satisfied in like manner. Title 5 V.LC. § 553. This is consistent with the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which is applicable to the Virgin Islands through Section 3 of the Revised Organic Act of 1954. Malpere v. Maipere, 46 V.I. 118, 122 (Terr. Ct. Dec. 29, 2004) (citing 68 Stat. 497 (July 22, 1954)). “A final

judgment in one State, if rendered by a court with adjudicatory authority over the subject matter in the Matter of Derek Lee Clive Oliver

Memorandum Opinion 2020 VI SUPER 94P Page 3 of 7

and persons governed by the judgment, qualifies for recognition throughout the land.” Malpere, 46 V.I. at 122 (citing Baker by Thomas v. General Motors Corporation, 522 U.S. 222, 118 S. Ct. 657, 139 L. Ed. 2d 580 (1998)). “Essentially, the Full Faith and Credit Clause generally requires every State to give to a judgment at least the res judicata effect which the judgment would be accorded in the State which rendered it.” Malpere, 46 V.I. at 122 (citing Durfee v, Duke, 375 U.S. 106, 109, 84 S. Ct. 242, 11 L. Ed. 2d 186 (1963); Mills v. Harmon Law Offices, P.C., 344 F.3d 42 (1st Cir. 2003)). DISCUSSION

qs Here, the copy of the Connecticut Order Petitioner provided is signed and sealed; there is no doubt as to its authenticity. The Connecticut Order is also a final judgment; the Connecticut court heard Petitioner’s case in its entirety, made findings of facts, entered a decree, and thereby closed the matter. However, the Court must note that while the Connecticut court had subject matter jurisdiction over its resident’s petition to confirm gender change,' the Connecticut court did not have subject matter jurisdiction over the enforcement measures to amend a Virgin Islands birth certificate. See Title 5 V.LC. § 553 (“A judgment so filed shall have the same effect and shall be subject to the same procedures, defenses and proceedings for reopening, vacating, or staying as a judgment of the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands and may be enforced or satisfied in like manner.”); see e.g., In re Cleopatra Cameron Gift Tr., 2019 S.D. 35, § 21, 931 N.W.2d 244, 250 (“There are, however, certain limitations upon the requirements of the Full Faith and Credit Clause. Providing full faith and credit to a foreign state's judgment "does not mean that States must adopt

the practices of other States regarding the time, manner, and mechanisms for

' The Connecticut Order listed an address in Wallingford, Connecticut for Petitioner. In the Matter of Derek Lee Clive Oliver

Memorandum Opinion 2020 VI SUPER 94P Page 4 of 7

enforcing judgments. Enforcement measures do not travel with the sister state judgment as preclusive effects do; such measures remain subject to the evenhanded control of forum law."); Irby v. Haden, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120647, at *5-6 (N.D. Cal. June 25, 2008) (“Enforcement measures, however, do not travel with the sister state judgment. Rather, enforcement measures are those of the forum state. Accordingly, a foreign judgment that is registered in district court in California is subject to California enforcement measures. As applied here, this means that, although the original underlying judgment arose in Texas, plaintiff's registration of the judgment in California district court means that it is California law that controls the question of its enforcement in California.”). As such, the Connecticut Order will be domestically recognized by the courts of the Virgin Islands to the extent that it confirmed Petitioner’s gender change and ordered an amendment of Petitioner’s birth certificate, but the time, manner, and mechanisms for enforcing the amendment of Petitioner’s birth certificate will be determined by Virgin Islands law. A. Amendment of Virgin Islands Birth Certificate

q6 Title 19, Chapter 37 of the Virgin Islands Code governs the vital statistics of the Virgin Islands including births and deaths. Title 19 V.LC. § 801 et seq.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Durfee v. Duke
375 U.S. 106 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Baker v. General Motors Corp.
522 U.S. 222 (Supreme Court, 1998)
Mills v. Harmon Law Offices, P.C.
344 F.3d 42 (First Circuit, 2003)
In re Cleopatra Cameron Gift Trust
931 N.W.2d 244 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2019)
Malpere v. Malpere
46 V.I. 118 (Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands, 2004)
Matter of Cameron Trust
2019 S.D. 35 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In the Matter of Dereck Lee Clive, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-dereck-lee-clive-visuper-2020.