In the Matter of Daniel O'Connell

California Supreme Court

In the Matter of Daniel O'Connell

189 P. 709, 182 Cal. 786, 1920 Cal. LEXIS 576

California Supreme Court·Decided April 16, 1920·No. Crim. No. 2306.·Published

Opinions

The facts in this case are in all material respects the same as those in the Matter of Riccardi, ante, p. 675, [189 P. 694]. The conviction of the accused was in the United States district court of the northern district of California, and was for conspiring to violate the acts of Congress of May 18, 1917, and June 15, 1917, and the case is pending on writ of error in the United States supreme court.

It is ordered that action upon the certified copy of the judgment presented be deferred pending the determination of the appeal of the attorney from such judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The facts in this case are in all material respects the same as those in the Matter of Riccardi, ante, p. 675, [189 P. 694]. The conviction of the accused was in the United States district court of the northern district of California, and was for conspiring to violate the acts of Congress of May 18, 1917, and June 15, 1917, and the case is pending on writ of error in the United States supreme court.

It is ordered that action upon the certified copy of the judgment presented be deferred pending the determination of the appeal of the attorney from such judgment.

In the Matter of Daniel O'Connell, 189 P. 709, 182 Cal. 786, 1920 Cal. LEXIS 576 (Cal. 1920).

Pincite

189 P. 709 (In the Matter of Daniel O'Connell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related