Home/California Supreme Court/In the Matter of Daniel O'Connell

In the Matter of Daniel O'Connell

189 P. 709, 182 Cal. 786, 1920 Cal. LEXIS 576
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedApril 16, 1920
DocketCrim. No. 2306.
StatusPublished

This text of 189 P. 709 (In the Matter of Daniel O'Connell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Matter of Daniel O'Connell, 189 P. 709, 182 Cal. 786, 1920 Cal. LEXIS 576 (Cal. 1920).

Opinions

The facts in this case are in all material respects the same as those in the Matter of Riccardi, ante, p. 675, [189 P. 694]. The conviction of the accused was in the United States district court of the northern district of California, and was for conspiring to violate the acts of Congress of May 18, 1917, and June 15, 1917, and the case is pending on writ of error in the United States supreme court.

It is ordered that action upon the certified copy of the judgment presented be deferred pending the determination of the appeal of the attorney from such judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Riccardi
189 P. 694 (California Supreme Court, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
189 P. 709, 182 Cal. 786, 1920 Cal. LEXIS 576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-daniel-oconnell-cal-1920.