In the Matter of D. R. Sellers, Bankrupt v. Small Business Administration

Fifth Circuit

In the Matter of D. R. Sellers, Bankrupt v. Small Business Administration

407 F.2d 402

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 25, 1969

Docket26420_1

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 407 F.2d 402 (In the Matter of D. R. Sellers, Bankrupt v. Small Business Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Matter of D. R. Sellers, Bankrupt v. Small Business Administration, 407 F.2d 402 (5th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this case, the Referee in Bankruptcy denied a discharge to the appellant, D. R. Sellers. Upon review the District Court affirmed, In re Sellers, 295 F.Supp. 1354. Upon consideration of the appeal, we find no error in the action taken by the District Court, and we affirm on the basis of its published opinion. 1

Affirmed.

1

. Having studied the briefs and records, we have determined that this appeal is appropriate for summary disposition without argument. Pursuant to new Rule 18 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit the Clerk of this Court has been directed to put this case on the summary calendar and notify the parties in writing. See for example Gamez v. Beto, January 30, 1969 [406 F.2d 1000].

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In this case, the Referee in Bankruptcy denied a discharge to the appellant, D. R. Sellers. Upon review the District Court affirmed, In re Sellers, 295 F.Supp. 1354. Upon consideration of the appeal, we find no error in the action taken by the District Court, and we affirm on the basis of its published opinion. 1

Affirmed.

1

. Having studied the briefs and records, we have determined that this appeal is appropriate for summary disposition without argument. Pursuant to new Rule 18 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit the Clerk of this Court has been directed to put this case on the summary calendar and notify the parties in writing. See for example Gamez v. Beto, January 30, 1969 [406 F.2d 1000].

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

407 F.2d 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-d-r-sellers-bankrupt-v-small-business-administration-ca5-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack