in the Matter of D. O.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 10, 1996·No. 03-95-00468-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN



NO. 03-95-00468-CV



In the Matter of D. O.



FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF HAYS COUNTY

NO. 1606, HONORABLE HOWARD S. WARNER, II, JUDGE PRESIDING



PER CURIAM



Appellant D. O., a juvenile, appeals the trial court's order denying a pre-trial writ of habeas corpus. The Clerk of this Court filed the transcript on August 5, 1995, and the statement of facts on August 21, 1995. Appellant's brief was due to be filed on September 20, 1995.

By letter dated October 13, 1995, the Clerk of this Court notified the parties that the transcript, supplemental transcript and statement of facts were filed and that appellant's brief was due and that the appeal was subject to dismissal unless he tendered a motion by October 23, 1995 reasonably explaining his failure to file a brief. Tex. R. App. P. 74(l)1; see Tex. R. App. P. 60(a)(2). To date, D. O. has submitted neither a brief nor a motion for an extension of time to file a brief. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 60(a)(2), 74(l)(1); Sentinel Pipe Servs., Inc. v. Tandy Computer Leasing, 825 S.W.2d 212, 212 (Tex. App.--Fort Worth 1992, no writ); Dickson v. Dickson, 541 S.W.2d 895, 896 (Tex. Civ. App.--Austin 1976, writ dism'd w.o.j.).



Before Justices Powers, Jones and B. A. Smith

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: April 10, 1996

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in the Matter of D. O., (Tex. Ct. App. 1996).

in the Matter of D. O. (in the Matter of D. O.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dickson v. Dickson
541 S.W.2d 895 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1976)
Sentinel Pipe Services, Inc. v. Tandy Computer Leasing
825 S.W.2d 212 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)