In the Matter of Cruz

851 N.E.2d 960, 2006 Ind. LEXIS 642, 2006 WL 2053192
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 25, 2006
Docket49S00-0603-JD-80
StatusPublished

This text of 851 N.E.2d 960 (In the Matter of Cruz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Matter of Cruz, 851 N.E.2d 960, 2006 Ind. LEXIS 642, 2006 WL 2053192 (Ind. 2006).

Opinion

JUDICIAL DISCIPLINARY ACTION

PER CURIAM.

This matter comes before the Court as a result of a judicial disciplinary action brought by the Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications ("Commission") against the Respondent herein, Israel Nunez Cruz, Commissioner in the Marion Superior Court. Article 7 Section 4 of the Indiana Constitution and Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 25 give the Indiana Supreme Court original jurisdiction over this matter.

Subsequent to the filing of formal charges by the Commission, the parties jointly tendered a "Statement of Cireum-stances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline." The parties have stipulated to the following facts.

On June 26, 2005, at approximately 1:25 am. in Hendricks County, Indiana, the Respondent was arrested incident to a traffic stop after field sobriety tests and breath testing indicated an aleohol concentration equivalent to 0.08 grams of alcohol per 210 liters of breath. Based on the affidavit of the arresting officer, which the parties agree gave the State of Indiana probable cause to file charges, the State charged the Respondent with, among other things, Operating a Vehicle While Intoxicated in a manner endangering another, a Class A misdemeanor, Ind.Code § 9-830-5-2(b); and Operating a Vehicle with an alcohol concentration of at least 0.08 grams of alcohol per 210 liters of breath, a Class C misdemeanor, Ind.Code § 9-30-5-2(a). On November 21, 2005, on the State's motion, the Hendricks Superior Court dismissed all counts prior to any adjudication of guilt or innocence.

The Respondent and the Commission have agreed that by driving with a blood alcohol concentration equivalent to 0.08 grams of alcohol per 210 liters of breath, the Respondent failed to uphold the integrity of the judiciary and to maintain high standards of conduct, thereby violating Canon 1 of the Code of Judicial Conduct. The Court agrees with the parties.

The parties have further agreed, as does the Court, that the appropriate sanction for this misconduct is a public reprimand. Accordingly, Israel Nunez Cruz, Commissioner in the Marion Superior Court, is hereby reprimanded. This discipline terminates the disciplinary proceedings relating to the circumstances giving rise to this cause. The costs of this proceeding are assessed against the Respondent.

SHEPARD, C.J., and DICKSON, SULLIVAN, BOEHM, and RUCKER, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 9-30-5-2
Indiana § 9-30-5-2(a)
§ 9-830-5-2
Indiana § 9-830-5-2(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
851 N.E.2d 960, 2006 Ind. LEXIS 642, 2006 WL 2053192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-cruz-ind-2006.