In the Matter of Cook
This text of In the Matter of Cook (In the Matter of Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Johnny James Cook, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2018-001174
Appeal From Fairfield County Daniel Dewitt Hall, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-024 Submitted January 1, 2020 – Filed January 29, 2020
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and In re McCoy, 360 S.C. 425, 602 S.E.2d 58 (2004). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1
1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. APPEAL DISMISSED.
THOMAS, GEATHERS, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In the Matter of Cook, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-cook-scctapp-2020.