In the Matter Of: Constance P. Mercer, Debtor. At&t Universal Card Services v. Constance P. Mercer

218 F.3d 770, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 16684, 2000 WL 978044
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 7, 2000·No. 98-60693·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion April 26, 2000, 5 Cir., 2000, 211 F.3d 214)

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. *

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Matter Of: Constance P. Mercer, Debtor. At&t Universal Card Services v. Constance P. Mercer, 218 F.3d 770, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 16684, 2000 WL 978044 (5th Cir. 2000).

218 F.3d 770 (In the Matter Of: Constance P. Mercer, Debtor. At&t Universal Card Services v. Constance P. Mercer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

At&T Universal Card Services v. Mercer
246 F.3d 391 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)