In the Matter of Cloyd

794 N.E.2d 1088, 2003 Ind. LEXIS 739, 2003 WL 22097858
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 8, 2003
Docket49S00-0307-DI-313
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 794 N.E.2d 1088 (In the Matter of Cloyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Matter of Cloyd, 794 N.E.2d 1088, 2003 Ind. LEXIS 739, 2003 WL 22097858 (Ind. 2003).

Opinion

ORDER APPROVING STATEMENT OF CIRCUMSTANCES AND CONDITIONAL AGREEMENT FOR DISCIPLINE

Pursuant to Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 28, Section 11, the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and the respondent have submitted for approval a Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline stipulating a proposed discipline and agreed facts as summarized below:

Facts: On June 27, 2002, the Marion County Prosecutor's Office filed a criminal case against the respondent charging him with false reporting as a class A misdemeanor. The charges arose after the respondent, in connection with an Indiana State Police investigation into harassing telephone calls, untruthfully advised the state police that he had ceased dating a certain individual, when in fact the respondent was still dating the person. The charges were eventually dismissed after the respondent admitted the charges and agreed to participate in a behavior modification program.

Violations: - The respondent violated Ind.Professional Conduct Rule 8.4(b), which provides that a lawyer shall not commit a criminal act which reflects adversely on his honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects. He also violated Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(c), which prohibits a lawyer from engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation.

Discipline: Public reprimand.

*1089 The Court, having considered the submission of the parties, now APPROVES and ORDERS the agreed discipline. Costs of this proceeding are assessed against the respondent. The Clerk is directed to provide notice of this order to all parties as directed by Admis.Disc.R. 23(8)(d).

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of: Arthur J. Usher, IV
987 N.E.2d 1080 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2013)
In the Matter of Cloyd
862 N.E.2d 648 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
794 N.E.2d 1088, 2003 Ind. LEXIS 739, 2003 WL 22097858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-cloyd-ind-2003.