In the Matter of Chisolm

• Court: Court of Appeals of South Carolina
• Decided: June 7, 2017
• Docket: 2017-UP-240
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Alton Chisolm, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2014-002351

Appeal From Charleston County R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-240 Submitted May 1, 2017 – Filed June 7, 2017

APPEAL DISMISSED

James Kristian Falk, of Falk Law Firm, LLC, of Charleston, and Alton Chisolm, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).1 Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.2

WILLIAMS and KONDUROS, JJ., and LEE, A.J., concur.

1 See In re McCoy, 360 S.C. 425, 602 S.E.2d 58 (2004) (adopting the Anders procedure for alleged no-merit appeals in sexually violent predator involuntary commitment appeals). 2 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.