In the Matter of Charles H. Flasphaler

D.C. Circuit

In the Matter of Charles H. Flasphaler

271 F.2d 835, 106 U.S. App. D.C. 252, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3240

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedOctober 22, 1959

Docket14922

StatusPublished

This text of 271 F.2d 835 (In the Matter of Charles H. Flasphaler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Matter of Charles H. Flasphaler, 271 F.2d 835, 106 U.S. App. D.C. 252, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3240 (D.C. Cir. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The notice of appeal is from an order of the District Court of November 13, 1958, in Executive Session, 1 denying the *836 "Petition or Motion” of appellant filed in the District Court July 80, 1958, for reconsideration by the District Court of his application for admission to the bar. The application had been denied by the District Court, holding a General Term, on March 8, 1951, and again by action of the District Court dated June 30, 1955, in the form of a letter from the Chief Judge. From neither the action of the court on March 8, 1951, nor June 30, 1955, was an appeal attempted to be prosecuted. Moreover, the motion for reconsideration filed July 30, 1958, was out of time because it failed to satisfy Rule 60(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. 28 U.S.C.A. For these reasons, and without the necessity of considering other questions raised, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

It is so ordered.

1

. The order bears date November 13, 1958. A letter from the Acting Chief Judge of the District Court advising appellant of the order is dated November 14, 1958.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The notice of appeal is from an order of the District Court of November 13, 1958, in Executive Session, 1 denying the *836 "Petition or Motion” of appellant filed in the District Court July 80, 1958, for reconsideration by the District Court of his application for admission to the bar. The application had been denied by the District Court, holding a General Term, on March 8, 1951, and again by action of the District Court dated June 30, 1955, in the form of a letter from the Chief Judge. From neither the action of the court on March 8, 1951, nor June 30, 1955, was an appeal attempted to be prosecuted. Moreover, the motion for reconsideration filed July 30, 1958, was out of time because it failed to satisfy Rule 60(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. 28 U.S.C.A. For these reasons, and without the necessity of considering other questions raised, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

It is so ordered.

1

. The order bears date November 13, 1958. A letter from the Acting Chief Judge of the District Court advising appellant of the order is dated November 14, 1958.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 F.2d 835, 106 U.S. App. D.C. 252, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-charles-h-flasphaler-cadc-1959.