In the Matter Of: Charles H. Flasphaler
This text of 228 F.2d 53 (In the Matter Of: Charles H. Flasphaler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
228 F.2d 53
In the Matter of: Charles H. FLASPHALER, Petitioner.
Misc. No. 572.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued November 29, 1955.
Decided December 8, 1955.
Mr. Homer Brooks, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Mr. Paul A. Sweeney, Atty., Dept. of Justice, for respondent.
Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and PRETTYMAN, WILBUR K. MILLER, BAZELON, FAHY, WASHINGTON and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We allowed this petition for a writ of mandamus to be filed so that we might consider the petitioner's claim that it was the clear duty of the District Court to admit the petitioner to its bar. After hearing argument and being now fully advised, we find that mandamus does not lie. In re Jacobi, 94 U.S.App.D.C. 106, 217 F.2d 668.
Petition denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
228 F.2d 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-charles-h-flasphaler-cadc-1955.