in the Matter of C.D.
This text of in the Matter of C.D. (in the Matter of C.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _____________________ _____
NO. 09-14-00188-CV __________________________
IN THE MATTER OF C.D.
________________________________________________________________ _
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 10-02-01368 JV ________________________________________________________________ _
ORDER The clerk’s record in the above styled and numbered cause was filed May
12, 2014. The reporter’s record was due on May 12, 2014, but has not been
filed. The court reporter notified our Court on May 20, 2014, that no payment
arrangements had been made for preparation of the reporter’s record. A notice
was sent to appellant’s retained counsel, Jarrod Walker, that a response was due
by June 19, 2014. No response was filed and appellant’s retained counsel was
notified on August 4, 2014, that the case was being submitted on the clerk’s
record alone and the brief was due on or before September 3, 2014. On
September 5, 2014, the appellant’s retained attorney was notified that neither 1 the brief of the appellant nor a motion for extension of time to file the brief had
been filed. Although a response from appellant’s retained counsel was due to be
filed by September 15, 2014, we have received no response.
We abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court to conduct a
hearing attended by a representative of the State, counsel for the appellant, and
the appellant. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). We direct the trial court to
determine whether or not appellant desires to pursue his appeal. If appellant
desires to pursue his appeal, we direct the trial court to determine why the brief
of the appellant has not been filed, why appellant’s counsel has not responded
to late notices from this Court, and whether retained counsel has abandoned the
appeal. If the trial court determines that retained counsel has abandoned the
appeal, the trial court shall determine whether appellant is indigent and whether
counsel should be appointed for the appeal.
The record of the hearing, including any orders and findings of the trial
court judge, shall be sent to the appellate court for filing. The transcription of
the court reporter’s notes from the hearing and the recommendations of the trial
court judge are to be filed on or before October 27, 2014.
ORDER ENTERED September 25, 2014.
PER CURIAM
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger, and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Matter of C.D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-cd-texapp-2014.