in the Matter of C.D.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 25, 2014
Docket09-14-00188-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Matter of C.D. (in the Matter of C.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Matter of C.D., (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _____________________ _____

NO. 09-14-00188-CV __________________________

IN THE MATTER OF C.D.

________________________________________________________________ _

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 10-02-01368 JV ________________________________________________________________ _

ORDER The clerk’s record in the above styled and numbered cause was filed May

12, 2014. The reporter’s record was due on May 12, 2014, but has not been

filed. The court reporter notified our Court on May 20, 2014, that no payment

arrangements had been made for preparation of the reporter’s record. A notice

was sent to appellant’s retained counsel, Jarrod Walker, that a response was due

by June 19, 2014. No response was filed and appellant’s retained counsel was

notified on August 4, 2014, that the case was being submitted on the clerk’s

record alone and the brief was due on or before September 3, 2014. On

September 5, 2014, the appellant’s retained attorney was notified that neither 1 the brief of the appellant nor a motion for extension of time to file the brief had

been filed. Although a response from appellant’s retained counsel was due to be

filed by September 15, 2014, we have received no response.

We abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court to conduct a

hearing attended by a representative of the State, counsel for the appellant, and

the appellant. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). We direct the trial court to

determine whether or not appellant desires to pursue his appeal. If appellant

desires to pursue his appeal, we direct the trial court to determine why the brief

of the appellant has not been filed, why appellant’s counsel has not responded

to late notices from this Court, and whether retained counsel has abandoned the

appeal. If the trial court determines that retained counsel has abandoned the

appeal, the trial court shall determine whether appellant is indigent and whether

counsel should be appointed for the appeal.

The record of the hearing, including any orders and findings of the trial

court judge, shall be sent to the appellate court for filing. The transcription of

the court reporter’s notes from the hearing and the recommendations of the trial

court judge are to be filed on or before October 27, 2014.

ORDER ENTERED September 25, 2014.

PER CURIAM

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger, and Johnson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Matter of C.D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-cd-texapp-2014.