In the Matter of Cd
Opinion
In the Matter of C. D., Alleged to be a Mentally III Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
C. D., Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
James A. Palmer, Eugene, filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Jeff J. Payne, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and ROSENBLUM, Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant in this mental commitment case appeals an order committing him to the Mental Health Division for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. The trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder, is a danger to others, and is unable to care for his basic personal needs. The state concedes that the record lacks clear and convincing evidence that defendant's mental disorder causes him to be a danger to others or unable to care for his basic personal needs. On de novo review, we find the state's concession to be well founded and accept it.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
193 P.3d 46 (In the Matter of Cd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.