In the Matter of Castiglia

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In the Matter of Castiglia

963 A.2d 838, 197 N.J. 465, 2009 N.J. LEXIS 19

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedJanuary 29, 2009

DocketD-49 September Term 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 963 A.2d 838 (In the Matter of Castiglia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Matter of Castiglia, 963 A.2d 838, 197 N.J. 465, 2009 N.J. LEXIS 19 (N.J. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 08-211, concluding that V. JAMES CASTIGLIA of OAK RIDGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1977, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3(lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(c)(failure to explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary for the client to make informed decisions about the representation), and RPC 1.7(a)(2) and (b)(conflict of interest), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that Y. JAMES CASTIGLIA is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

*466 ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent: part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 08-211, concluding that V. JAMES CASTIGLIA of OAK RIDGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1977, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3(lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(c)(failure to explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary for the client to make informed decisions about the representation), and RPC 1.7(a)(2) and (b)(conflict of interest), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that Y. JAMES CASTIGLIA is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

*466 ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent: part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

963 A.2d 838, 197 N.J. 465, 2009 N.J. LEXIS 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-castiglia-nj-2009.