In the Matter of Carl D. Cook

Court of Appeals of South Carolina·Decided September 11, 2013·No. 2013-UP-351·Unpublished

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Carl Durrell Cook, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2012-206369

Appeal From Lexington County Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-351 Submitted August 1, 2013 – Filed September 11, 2013

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).1 Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.2

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and PIEPER and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

1 See also In re McCoy, 360 S.C. 425, 427, 602 S.E.2d 58, 59 (2004) (adopting the Anders procedure for alleged no-merit appeals in sexually violent predator involuntary commitment appeals). 2 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Matter of Carl D. Cook, (S.C. Ct. App. 2013).

In the Matter of Carl D. Cook (In the Matter of Carl D. Cook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
In Re the Care & Treatment of McCoy
602 S.E.2d 58 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2004)