In the Matter of Cameron

929 A.2d 1090, 192 N.J. 396, 2007 N.J. LEXIS 1060
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 7, 2007·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 07-058, concluding that JOSE M. CAMERON of PERTH AMBOY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1978, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter and to comply promptly with reasonable requests for information), and RPC 1.16(d) (failure to protect a client’s interest upon termination of the representation);

And the Court having determined from its review of the matter that an admonition is the appropriate quantum of discipline for respondent’s unethical conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOSE M. CAMERON is hereby admonished; and it is further

*397 ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Matter of Cameron, 929 A.2d 1090, 192 N.J. 396, 2007 N.J. LEXIS 1060 (N.J. 2007).

929 A.2d 1090 (In the Matter of Cameron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.