In the Matter of C_____ S_____ C

514 S.W.2d 97
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 10, 1974·No. No. 35588·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

The natural father of a minor child appeals from a judgment in a court-tried case holding it in the best interests of the child that the child remain in the custody of a Mr. & Mrs. J_ L_The natural father was granted weekly visitation rights.

In determining the issue of custody of a child, the predominate consideration is the welfare of the child. Testerman v. Frederich, 323 S.W.2d 522 (Mo.App.1959); Stockton v. Guthary, 415 S.W.2d 308 (Mo.App.1967); Maupin v. Neels, 451 S.W.2d 381 (Mo.App.1970). The record here does not demonstrate that the conclusion of the trial court on this issue is erroneous. An opinion reciting the facts which support that conclusion would have no precedential value. We therefore affirm the judgment in compliance with Rule 84.16(b), V.A.M. R.

Judgment affirmed.

CLEMENS, McMILLIAN and GUNN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Matter of C_____ S_____ C, 514 S.W.2d 97 (Mo. Ct. App. 1974).

514 S.W.2d 97 (In the Matter of C_____ S_____ C) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

J. L. W. v. D. C. W.
519 S.W.2d 724 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1975)
Jlw v. Dcw
519 S.W.2d 724 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1975)