in the Matter of C. L.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 12, 2004
Docket03-04-00031-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Matter of C. L. (in the Matter of C. L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Matter of C. L., (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-04-00031-CV

In the Matter of C. L.

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. J-23,718, HONORABLE WILLIAM D. KING, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The district court found beyond a reasonable doubt that C.L. committed criminal

trespass and adjudicated him delinquent. The court placed him on probation in his grandparents’

custody for six months.

C.L. stipulated at trial that he intentionally and knowingly entered the premises of a

middle school with notice that such entry was forbidden and without the permission of the principal,

who is the owner of the school for this purpose. By his sole issue on appeal, C.L. contends that the

district court lacked jurisdiction over him because he should have been tried under a more specific

statute with a less severe punishment range. Compare Tex. Educ. Code Ann. § 37.107 (West 1996)

(trespass on school grounds, Class C misdemeanor), with Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 30.05 (West 2004-

05) (trespass, Class B misdemeanor). He argues that because the lesser offense is a Class C

misdemeanor and is not within the definition of delinquent conduct, the district court lacked jurisdiction. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 51.03(a) (West Supp. 2004-05); see also Tex. Const. art.

V, § 19 (justice court has original jurisdiction over offenses punishable by fine only).

This Court has recently concluded in a similar juvenile case that these statutes are not

in pari materia, that the State could charge the juvenile under either statute, and that the district court

had jurisdiction over the allegation of criminal trespass against the juvenile. See In the Matter of

J.M.R., No. 03-03-00749-CV, slip op. at 8, 2004 WL 2357887, at *4 (Tex. App.—Austin Oct. 21,

2004, no pet. h.). This appeal is controlled by that decision.

We affirm the judgment of the district court.

__________________________________________

Bea Ann Smith, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Pemberton

Affirmed

Filed: November 12, 2004

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re JMR
149 S.W.3d 289 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Matter of C. L., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-c-l-texapp-2004.